LACP.org
.........
Blueprint for Blue Ribbon Rampart Review Panel
. . . funding the plan will begin the process

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Blueprint for Blue Ribbon Rampart Review Panel
. . . funding the plan will begin the process

December 2, 2003

At today's Police Commission meeting Andre Birotte, Commission Inspector General, requested a small amendment to the Policies and Authority relative to the Inspector General's work with the recently formed Blue Ribbon Rampart Review Panel. The Commission approved the change, so now the document below, which outline the plan, will be forwarded to the Mayor and City Council.

Funding for the work of the Rampart Panel, estimated at $367,000, will be coordinated by the nonprofit Los Angeles Police Foundation, which states, "The mission of the Los Angeles Police Foundation is to support and promote public safety through partnerships which provide resources to help the Los Angeles Police Department perform at its highest level in service to the community."

Tax deducible donations have been accumulating from many of LA's most prominent law firms and placed in a special account dedicated to the Blue Ribbon Rampart Review Panel.

Here's the presentation Andre Birotte made to the Police Commission:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

BLUEPRINT FOR OPERATIONS OF THE
BLUE RIBBON RAMPART REVIEW PANEL

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It is recommended that the Board approve this report and transmit it to the Mayor and City Council for approval. This report has been developed to address the operational issues required to facilitate the Police Commission's Blue Ribbon Rampart Review Panel (Panel) in the performance of it's mission. This report recommends that the Board adopt several action items and, where applicable, transmit those recommendations and requests to the Mayor and City Council for approval. Those action items include:

1. RECOMMEND and REQUEST that the City Council) waive any conflicts that may exist for appointees to the Panel;
2. RECOMMEND and REQUEST that the City approve the Panel's request that the City agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Panel members for civil liability in performing services for the Commission and the City to the same extent as that afforded to regular City employees. (This would not apply to any claim for worker's compensation benefits.)
3. REQUEST that the City Attorney, City Council, Mayor's Office, City Risk Manager and other appropriate Departments' work with Commission staff to identify a method of establishing an expeditious process for the receipt and disbursement of donated funds consistent with City requirements.
4. DIRECT Panel members, upon Mayor and City Council action on this report, to begin working on their assigned mission.
5. ADOPT a finding that the mission of the Blue Ribbon Rampart Review Panel is of utmost necessity in the effort to restore pride and trust in this organization and make it the finest police department in the world and, further, find and declare that there is an urgency for the Blue Ribbon Rampart Review Panel to begin its mission as soon as possible.

Andre Birotte, Jr., Inspector General
Board of Police Commissioners

Attachment

Here's the actual plan of action:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Blueprint for Operations
of the
Blue Ribbon Rampart Review Panel


November 17, 2003

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On July 22, 2003, the Board of Police Commissioners (Commission) adopted the attached Resolution declaring the formation of the Blue Ribbon Rampart Review Panel (panel) to analyze the causes of and responses to the Rampart Area police corruption scandal (Attachment 1).

EDITOR'S NOTE: Click here to see the LACP article which lists the 10 members:

Rampart Panel Established
July 23, 2002

That Resolution included the following mission statement for the Panel:

"The Panel's mission is to investigate and review the response by the City and others to the Rampart Area scandal in order to determine the extent to which the underlying causes for the scandal have been identified and addressed. The Panel will make findings regarding the adequacy of the City's response and will make recommendations for reforms designed to prevent any such event from ever occurring in the future. The Panel's efforts will result in a report to the Police Commission, which the Commission will make available to the public."

Neither discipline nor prosecution is the aim of this Panel. Therefore, the Panel is not expected to retrace past investigations of the scandal nor will it investigate any alleged acts of misconduct. Rather, the Panel will focus on the City's response to determine whether the core causes of the scandal have been identified, the appropriate policies and procedures established to address the issues, and the proper protocols put in place to facilitate various agencies, e.g., LAPD, the District Attorney and federal authorities, in dealing effectively with any similar event that may occur in the future.

The Commission's Resolution recognized that further action would be required to address issues relating to the Panel's operation and service by its members. That includes obtaining all necessary approvals from the Mayor, City Council, and other City officials to ensure that the Panel operates in compliance with all City policies and procedures. This report was prepared to identify and resolve those operational issues. Upon approval by the Commission, this document will be forwarded to the Mayor, City Council, and City Attorney for their review and approval, " as many of these issues require their final approval on behalf of the City.

1.
Panel Operations. In fulfilling its mission, the Panel will operate as an extension of the Commission working through the Commission's Office of the Inspector General. This will ensure that the Panel has full access to the Inspector General's insight, experience, and authority. That includes access to Department records, full and complete access to Department personnel and the depth of information that has been accumulated by the Office of the Inspector General. While the Panel will use its own judgment regarding the conduct of its inquiry and the content of its report, establishing a close working relationship between the Panel and the Inspector General will ensure that the Panel has ready access to the material and individuals it needs to complete its mission within the confidentiality and privilege restrictions governing the Panel.
2.
Confidentiality and Conflict Waiver Agreement. A Confidentiality and Conflict Waiver Agreement is being drafted and will provide that the information, documents, and other material(s) received by the Panel members and its staff are, and shall remain confidential to the extent they are legally privileged or otherwise unavailable to the public. Once the City Council approves the agreement in connection with its waiver of conflicts, the Panel members and their staff will sign it prior to being given access to any confidential or privileged information. That agreement specifically provides any and all materials, documents, notes or other information obtained from the Department or Commission as well as any information or material gathered, generated or prepared by Panel members or their staff shall remain confidential and be given to and retained by the Office of the Inspector General upon publication of the Panel's final report. The agreement will also contain language addressing future litigation by Panel members, as described in Section 3B below.
3.
Legal Conflicts.

A. Each member of the Panel has provided a personal statement of legal conflicts with respect to their participation on the Panel and any involvement they may have in litigation involving the City of Los Angeles (Attachment 2). The City Council has sole authority to waive any legal conflict a Panel member may have with the City. The Panel members' conflict statements have been reviewed and it is recommended that the Commission request the City Council waive any conflict that may exist for the Panel members.

B. The Confidentiality and Conflict Waiver Agreement will also include a provision that there is a conflict of interest with the City and its employees in future litigation involving alleged actions or inactions relating to the Rampart scandal or its underlying causes, against any individual police officer whose personnel records the Panel member reviews during the course of the Panel's investigation or any other litigation based upon information obtained during the Panel's work. In future litigation arising from these circumstances, the City, in its discretion, may exercise its right to disqualify Panel members or their firms from that litigation. In other representation contexts by Panel members or their firms against the City or its employees, the City will not seek to disqualify Panel members or their firms solely because of their Panel membership.
4.
Indemnification. The Commission should request that the City agree to the Panel's request that the City agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Panel members from civil liability in performing services for the Commission and the City to the same extent as that afforded to regular City employees. This indemnification does not apply to any claim for worker's compensation benefits. Volunteer staff members should be encouraged to register with the Mayor's Volunteer Program. All paid staff, consultants, and independent contractors shall abide by the terms specified in the City's Standard Professional Services Agreement.
5.
Legal Representation. Pursuant to City Charter Section 271(b), the City Attorney will be the Panel's legal advisor.
6.
Brown Act. The Panel is governed by the State's public meeting regulations known as the Brown Act and it shall comply with all of its provisions including agendas, announcement of meetings, and keeping of minutes.
7.
Subpoena Power. The Panel expects to conduct its review by interviewing percipient witnesses, reviewing documentary evidence, and consulting with experts in a broad range of fields related to police practices. In general, the panel anticipates receiving broad cooperation during that process. However, should the need for a compelled interview arise, the Panel will work through the Inspector General who will facilitate the use of the Commission's subpoena power. Pursuant to the Charter, subpoena requests must be made by the Commission President.
8.
Administrative Immunity. The Commission has recognized that limited administrative use immunity is an important component of the Panel's work. The precise language and parameters of that limited use immunity is being finalized and will be submitted for approval upon completion.
9.
Department Records. Many records created and maintained by the Department are readily available to the public. The Panel will have full access to those public records and need not return them upon completion of the Panel's work. However, the Panel shall only access non-public or confidential records through the Office of the Inspector General who shall maintain a log of the Panel's access to those records. The Panel will not be allowed to remove personnel records including personnel packages and personnel investigations from the Office of the Inspector General. The Panel will not be allowed access to medical records or records maintained by Behavioral Sciences Services without the written approval of the Police Commission President. Upon completion of the Panel' s work, records shall be disposed of in accordance with Section 2 above.
10.
Publication of Report. Prior to publication of the Panel's final report, the Inspector General, Police Department and City Attorney must be given an opportunity to review it solely in order to ensure that any confidential or privileged material is not improperly disclosed.
11.
Release of Report and Follow-up. The Panel' s report will be released jointly by the Panel and Police Commission. Following publication of the Panel's report, the Commission will establish a process that responds to declined recommendations, implements accepted recommendations, and reports publicly on the Department's implementation progress.
12.
Financing. The Board of Police Commissioners will be involved in raising the funds necessary to support the Panel's work, including cash and in-kind donations. The Commission intends to utilize the Police Foundation to administer the receipt and disbursement of those donated funds. The Commission should request that its staff work with the City Attorney, City Council, Mayor's Office, City Risk Manager, and other appropriate departments to identify a method of establishing that process consistent with the City's requirements.
13.

Budget. The following estimated budget has been developed for the Panel which can be achieved through a combination of cash and in-kind services:

$
250,000
Investigative Team
30,000
Clerical support
30,000
Paralegal and writing support
25,000
Consultant services
22,000
Rent, copying and office supplies
10,000
Travel expenses

$
=======
367,000
.
Total

To read about the Los Angeles Police Foundation, the nonprofit organization which is raising the money for the Blue Ribbon Rampart Review Panel, click here:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Los Angeles Police Foundation

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~