Coffee with a Cop bringing police, citizens together in friendly setting
by Beth Smith
HENDERSON, Ky. Who's to say what will bring people together?
In downtown Henderson on Wednesday, it was coffee.
The Henderson Police Department participated in a program called Coffee with a Cop, a national initiative designed to forge relationships between law enforcement and communities.
Held at the Downtown Diner, citizens were invited to drink coffee with officers and talk about, well, anything.
That's exactly what they did.
A steady stream of residents filed into the restaurant to converse with law enforcement over cups of steaming coffee.
This is great, said Sgt. Chris Cognac, a California police officer and one of the program's creators.
Henderson should be proud. Besides Louisville, Henderson is the only other police department in Kentucky to participate so far. However, he said, more Kentucky departments have shown interest and have been involved in the training.
Cognac, along with the program's two other creators, Capt. Keith Kauffman and Detective John Dixon, all of the Hawthorne Police Department in the Los Angeles area, were at the Downtown Diner on Wednesday to guide local officers in the process.
Cognac said they developed the program three years ago in an effort to connect with citizens.
We wanted to remove the barriers like the (police) car, the 911 calls, for people. We wanted a relaxed atmosphere for people to talk to us, and (for police) to get to know people, he said. We wanted to identify people as stakeholders in the community just as we are.
It worked. Three months ago, Coffee with a Cop became a nationwide program.
We travel across America about once a month planting seeds of community policing, Cognac said.
We developed a curriculum (for officers) ... how to (relearn) some things, he said.
For instance, police officers are trained to put distance between themselves and others for safety reasons, Cognac said. Sitting face to face, across a booth, while drinking coffee, he said, is something that takes some officers out of their comfort zone.
An Alabama officer was nervous because he didn't know what to say to a family that had come in to speak with him during Coffee with a Cop, Cognac said. He's faced armed robbers but talking with a grandmother and her family was difficult for him, Cognac said.
Eventually, the officer relaxed and spent 45 minutes chatting with the family, Cognac said.
We teach (officers) to talk about everything, he said.
The three California officers held a two-day seminar in Evansville and Henderson for interested departments.
Meeting with more than 30 officers from Illinois, Missouri and Ohio as well as Kentucky and Indiana Tuesday at Old National Bank in Downtown Evansville, Cognac reviewed the philosophy of community policing saying it aids in problem solving and relationship building.
The Evansville Police Department initiated monthly Coffee with a Cop sessions in January, meeting with city residents at various Donut Banks.
(Coffee with a Cop) is adaptable to every community, Cognac said. We do it different in Los Angeles ... It's done different here.
It doesn't cost police departments anything, Cognac said.
I think we're making more of an impact with coffee than with high-tech equipment, he said.
In Henderson, Officer Jennifer Richmond, HPD's public information officer, said Some came just to speak with us about issues from a condemned house posing safety issues to they just wanted to meet officers face to face, Richmond said.
It went very well, and we're very happy with it, she said.
The date of the next Coffee with a Cop in Henderson is still to be announced.
The feedback (about the program) has been unbelievable, Cognac said. You come to these and you remember why you became a cop.
This is a growing movement, he said. It's building community policing, one cup of coffee at a time.
From the Department of Justice
Attorney General Eric Holder Addresses the NAACP Annual Convention
Thank you, Derrick [Johnson], for those kind words and thank you all for such a warm welcome. It's a pleasure to be in Orlando today. And it's a privilege to join President [Ben] Jealous, Chairman [Roslyn] Brock, your National Board of Directors and my good friends Secretary [Shaun] Donovan and Secretary [Kathleen] Sebelius in celebrating the NAACP's 104th Annual Convention, and recommitting ourselves to your important work.
I'm proud to be in such good company this afternoon among so many friends, courageous civil rights leaders, and passionate men and women who have dedicated themselves to bringing our nation together, addressing common challenges, and focusing attention on the problems and inequities that too many of our citizens continue to face.
Even as this convention proceeds, we are all mindful of the tragic and unnecessary shooting death of Trayvon Martin last year in Sanford, just a short distance from here and the state trial that reached its conclusion on Saturday evening. Today, I'd like to join President Obama in urging all Americans to recognize that as he said we are a nation of laws, and the jury has spoken. I know the NAACP and its members are deeply, and rightly, concerned about this case as passionate civil rights leaders, as engaged citizens, and most of all as parents. This afternoon, I want to assure you of two things: I am concerned about this case and as we confirmed last spring, the Justice Department has an open investigation into it. While that inquiry is ongoing, I can promise that the Department of Justice will consider all available information before determining what action to take.
Independent of the legal determination that will be made, I believe this tragedy provides yet another opportunity for our nation to speak honestly and openly about the complicated and emotionally-charged issues that this case has raised.
Years ago, some of these same issues drove my father to sit down with me to have a conversation which is no doubt familiar to many of you about how as a young black man I should interact with the police, what to say, and how to conduct myself if I was ever stopped or confronted in a way I thought was unwarranted. I'm sure my father felt certain at the time that my parents' generation would be the last that had to worry about such things for their children.
Since those days, our country has indeed changed for the better. The fact that I stand before you as the 82nd Attorney General of the United States, serving in the Administration of our first African American President, proves that. Yet, for all the progress we've seen, recent events demonstrate that we still have much more work to do and much further to go. The news of Trayvon Martin's death last year, and the discussions that have taken place since then, reminded me of my father's words so many years ago. And they brought me back to a number of experiences I had as a young man when I was pulled over twice and my car searched on the New Jersey Turnpike when I'm sure I wasn't speeding, or when I was stopped by a police officer while simply running to a catch a movie, at night in Georgetown, in Washington, D.C. I was at the time of that last incident a federal prosecutor.
Trayvon's death last spring caused me to sit down to have a conversation with my own 15 year old son, like my dad did with me. This was a father-son tradition I hoped would not need to be handed down. But as a father who loves his son and who is more knowing in the ways of the world, I had to do this to protect my boy. I am his father and it is my responsibility, not to burden him with the baggage of eras long gone, but to make him aware of the world he must still confront. This is a sad reality in a nation that is changing for the better in so many ways.
As important as it was, I am determined to do everything in my power to ensure that the kind of talk I had with my son isn't the only conversation that we engage in as a result of these tragic events.
In the days leading up to this weekend's verdict, some predicted and prepared for riots and waves of civil unrest across the country. Some feared that the anger of those who disagreed with the jury might overshadow and obscure the issues at the heart of this case. But the people of Sanford, and, for the most part, thousands of others across America, rejected this destructive path. They proved wrong those who doubted their commitment to the rule of law. And across America, diverse groups of citizens, from all races, backgrounds, and walks of life, are instead overwhelmingly making their voices heard as American citizens have the right to do through peaceful protests, rallies, and vigils designed to inspire responsible debate not incite violence and division; and those who conduct themselves in a contrary manner do not honor the memory of Trayvon Martin.
I hope that we will continue to approach this necessarily difficult dialogue with the same dignity that those who have lost the most Trayvon's parents have demonstrated throughout the last year and especially over the past few days. They suffered a pain that no parent should have to endure and one that I, as a father, cannot begin to conceive. As we embrace their example and hold them in our prayers we must not forego this opportunity to better understand one another. And we must not fail to seize this chance to improve this nation we cherish.
Today starting here and now it's time to commit ourselves to a respectful, responsible dialogue about issues of justice and equality so we can meet division and confusion with understanding, with compassion, and ultimately with truth.
It's time to strengthen our collective resolve to combat gun violence but also time to combat violence involving or directed toward our children so we can prevent future tragedies. And we must confront the underlying attitudes, mistaken beliefs, and unfortunate stereotypes that serve too often as the basis for police action and private judgments.
Separate and apart from the case that has drawn the nation's attention, it's time to question laws that senselessly expand the concept of self-defense and sow dangerous conflict in our neighborhoods. These laws try to fix something that was never broken. There has always been a legal defense for using deadly force if and the if is important no safe retreat is available.
But we must examine laws that take this further by eliminating the common sense and age-old requirement that people who feel threatened have a duty to retreat, outside their home, if they can do so safely. By allowing and perhaps encouraging violent situations to escalate in public, such laws undermine public safety. The list of resulting tragedies is long and unfortunately has victimized too many who are innocent. It is our collective obligation we must stand our ground to ensure that our laws reduce violence, and take a hard look at laws that contribute to more violence than they prevent.
We must also seek a dialogue on attitudes about violence and disparities that are too commonly swept under the rug by honoring the finest traditions established by generations of NAACP leaders and other nonviolent advocates throughout history; and by paying tribute to the young man who lost his life here last year and so many others whose futures have been cut short in other incidents of gun violence that pass, too often unnoticed, in our streets: by engaging with one another in a way that is at once peaceful, inclusive, respectful and strong.
As we move forward together, I want to assure you that the Department will continue to act in a manner that is consistent with the facts and the law. We are committed to doing everything possible to ensure that in every case, in every circumstance, and in every community justice must be done.
For more than a century since this organization was founded, in 1909 the NAACP has led efforts to do just that, standing on the front lines of our fight to ensure security, opportunity, and equal treatment under law. Especially in times of need and moments of danger, you have dared to seek opportunities for progress and growth challenging this nation to aim higher, to become better, and to move ever closer to its founding ideals.
Under the banner of the NAACP, courageous men and women like W.E.B. DuBois, Walter White, Charles Hamilton Houston, Ida B. Wells, Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King, Jr. and countless others whose names may be less familiar, but whose contributions are no less important have raised their voices, and too often given their lives, to advance our common pursuit of a more perfect Union. Their stories prove that today's civil rights leaders can best honor the progress of the last century by planning for the challenges of the next. Their examples remind us that as recent events illustrate our work is far from over. And it's time to acknowledge, once again, that we have much more to do.
After all, we come together today in another moment of need, during a year defined by historic milestones including, just last month, the 50th anniversary of the infamous Stand in the Schoolhouse Door when two brave young students enlisted the advice of NAACP lawyers, the support of the Justice Department, and the protection of the National Guard to step past Governor George Wallace and integrate the University of Alabama.
One of those students, Vivian Malone, would much later become my sister-in-law. Although she passed away several years ago much too soon her courage made a strong impression on me when I was a young man. Her story, and others like it, drove me to dream of a career in public service and led me to spend my first summer in law school working for the NAACP's Legal Defense Fund. And her memory inspires me to think often of the historic speech that President John F. Kennedy delivered on that fateful night 50 years ago last month when he addressed the American people; expressed his support for Vivian and her classmate, James Hood; and described the cause of civil rights as a moral issue that is as old as the scriptures and . . . as clear as the Constitution.
In that extraordinary moment, President Kennedy urged his fellow citizens to refuse to accept that anyone could be denied opportunity, denied education, or denied the future of their choosing just because of the color of their skin. And he called on Congress to pass sweeping civil rights legislation outlining a series of proposals that would later be included in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Once signed into law by his successor, President Lyndon Johnson, these proposals affirmed and codified into law the greatest of American ideals: that all are created equal. They established protections for the rights to which every citizen, and every eligible voter, is entitled. And they came to represent nothing less than the foundation of modern civil rights law.
Unfortunately, last month, an important piece of this foundation was chipped away when the Supreme Court invalidated a key part of the Voting Rights Act.
Over the years and in the past 18 months this provision, called pre-clearance, allowed the Department to take swift action against numerous jurisdictions that adopted rules or procedures with either a discriminatory purpose or effect. It served as a potent tool for addressing inequities in our elections systems. And it proved the effectiveness of a legal mechanism that puts on hold any new voting changes until they have been subjected to a fair, and thorough, review.
Let me be clear: this was a deeply disappointing and flawed decision. It dealt a serious setback to the cause of voting rights. And, like all of you, I strongly disagree with the Court's action.
After all, as we've seen over the last 18 months, numerous successful decisions in the Department's Voting Rights Act cases have proven that far from being an antiquated relic of a bygone era such a process frequently resulted in approvals for fair and impartial voting changes, while allowing the Department to work with jurisdictions to address problems wherever they occur.
For instance, just last year, a federal court noted the vital function that preclearance played in protecting black voters who would have been disproportionately impacted by a photo ID law in South Carolina. Because of the Department's engagement with the state during the administrative review and later litigation, South Carolina officials changed how their new voting statute will be implemented in future elections to eliminate what would otherwise have been a dramatic discriminatory effect. Another court cited the Voting Rights Act in blocking a Texas congressional redistricting map that would have discriminated against Latino voters noting that the parties provided more evidence of discriminatory intent than we have space, or need, to address here.
These cases, and many others, illustrate that these problems are real. They are significant. They corrode the foundations of our democracy. And they are of today not yesterday. In fact, despite last month's ruling, every member of the Supreme Court has agreed that as the Chief Justice wrote, voting discrimination still exists: no one doubts that. Therefore, the struggle for voting rights cannot be relegated to the pages of history. And this is why protecting the fundamental right to vote for all Americans will continue to be a top priority for the Department of Justice so long as I have the privilege of serving as Attorney General.
It's also why although I remain disappointed with this outcome I believe we must regard it not as a defeat, but as a rare and historic opportunity: for Congress to consider new legislation restoring and even strengthening modern voting protections in a manner that's consistent with the record established by one of the most effective civil rights laws in American history.
After all, in the nearly half-century since its passage, the Voting Rights Act enjoyed broad, bipartisan support on Capitol Hill as well as in the executive branch. Its most recent reauthorization passed Congress with near-unanimous support in 2006, and was signed into law by President Bush just as prior reauthorizations had been signed by Presidents Reagan, Ford, and Nixon.
This is because providing fair and equal access to the ballot box has never been a partisan issue. It's an American issue. It's about the core values that define us as a nation and who we say we are as a people.
Whatever solutions our Congressional leaders consider, I urge them to bear in mind as they move forward that the right to vote is both a guarantee and a sacred duty, conferred by citizenship and protected by the United States Constitution. Quite simply, Congress must take steps to ensure that every eligible American has equal access to the polls.
In the meantime, the Justice Department will continue to monitor jurisdictions around the country for any changes that may hamper voting rights. We will not hesitate to take aggressive action using every tool that remains available to us against any jurisdiction that attempts to take advantage of the Supreme Court's ruling by hindering eligible citizens' free and fair exercise of the franchise.
We also will not wait for Congressional action to refine and re-focus our current enforcement efforts. In fact, I am announcing today that I have directed the Department's Civil Rights Division to shift resources to the enforcement of Voting Rights Act provisions that were not affected by the Supreme Court's ruling including Section 2, which prohibits voting discrimination based on race, color, or language in addition to other federal voting rights laws.
It is clear that our work is anything but complete. Our cause is not yet fulfilled. And, for all the progress we've made over the last 104 years our nation's journey along the road to equality and opportunity is far from over.
This journey goes on every day in the efforts of those who seek to extend the legacy that our predecessors have established by combating violence and realizing America's founding, and enduring, promise of equal justice under law. It goes on in the steadfast commitment of my colleagues throughout the Justice Department and the entire Obama Administration to prevent all types of civil rights violations. Most of all, it goes on in the passionate advocacy of concerned, dedicated, and ultimately hopeful men and women in and far beyond this room: the members and leaders of America's oldest and largest civil rights organization.
Make no mistake the NAACP's work is not just historically relevant. It is, and will always be, a vital and contemporary part of what makes this country truly exceptional.
So let us pledge that we will honor heroes like Dr. King, Medgar Evers, Vivian Malone and so many others who have struggled, sacrificed, and died for the freedoms we now enjoy by zealously guarding the progress they achieved, and matching their contributions with our own.
Above all, let us act with optimism, and without delay to seize the breathtaking opportunities now before us. To see that justice is done, and strengthen our nation's long tradition of increasing opportunity and inclusion. And to continue the work that constitutes our shared purpose, and must always remain our common cause: the enduring pursuit of a more equitable, more just, and more perfect Union.
From the Department of Homeland Security
TSA Launches Application Program for TSA Pre ?
WASHINGTON The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) announced today that it will add a new process allowing more U.S. citizens to enroll in TSA Pre ? , an expedited screening program that allows pre-approved airline travelers to leave on their shoes, light outerwear and belt, keep their laptop in its case and their 3-1-1 compliant liquids/gels bag in a carry-on in select screening lanes.
Previously, to be eligible for TSA Pre ? , travelers had to opt-in through an airline's frequent flier program, or be enrolled in one of CBP's Global Entry, SENTRI or NEXUS Trusted Traveler programs. To date, more than 12 million travelers have already experienced TSA Pre ? at 40 airports nationwide, and today's announcement will expand the availability of this program to a larger portion of traveling U.S. citizens.
Starting later this year, U.S. citizens will be able to apply online and visit an enrollment site to provide identification and fingerprints. TSA will start the program at two initial enrollment sites Washington Dulles International Airport and Indianapolis International Airport with plans to expand to additional enrollment sites nationwide.
This initiative will increase the number of U.S. citizens eligible to receive expedited screening, through TSA Pre ? , said TSA Administrator John S. Pistole. TSA Pre ? enables us to focus on the travelers we know the least about, adding efficiency and effectiveness to the screening process.
The TSA Pre ? application program requires a background check, fingerprints, and an anticipated enrollment fee of $85 for a five-year membership. Once approved, travelers will receive a Known Traveler Number (KTN) and the opportunity to go through TSA Pre ? lanes at security checkpoints at participating airports.
TSA will always incorporate random and unpredictable security measures throughout the airport and no individual will be guaranteed expedited screening.
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) was created in the wake of September 11, 2001, to strengthen the security of the nation's transportation systems and ensure the freedom of movement for people and commerce. Today, TSA secures the nation's airports and screens all commercial airline passengers and baggage. TSA uses a risk-based strategy and works closely with transportation, law enforcement and intelligence communities to set the standard for excellence in transportation security. TSA's workforce comprises approximately 50,000 frontline officers who screen approximately 1.8 million travelers each day at more than 450 airports nationwide. For more information about TSA, please visit our website at www.tsa.gov .